e.k2011 wrote:Is it any wonder that the founder of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard, had Aleister Crowley as his mentor with his 'Do What Thou Wilt' motto. No time for morals and principles!..
The comments especially over at daily mail are so appaling. They don't seem to pay any attention to details: Different OS, different timelines and names on the messages etc.
I find it very strange that Cathriona started 'liking' and 'retweeting' Jim's tweets only from December 2014 onwards while her twitter account started in February 2013.
She started uploading photos of Jim's home around December 2014 too. Jim's lawyer mentioned that Cathriona sought Jim for reconciliation in November 2014.
https://twitter.com/littleirishcat
https://www.instagram.com/littleirishcat/
They are the worst people. Just the worst. I know I keep plugging Tony Ortega but if you go onto his site, there's SO many commenters on there who have suffered at the hands of Scientology and been victims of their harrassment.
As for the Daily Mail, the comments are ALWAYS appalling. It's a terrible publication. You have to try and ignore it, I'm afraid.
This whole thing is very strange indeed. I've always had an issue with the amount of pictures she posted related to Jim. No, he wasn't *in* them but for anyone who knows the slightest thing about him, they were very easily identifiable. And seeing as they were pictured in the press together in Spring 2015, all the photos she posted after that were quite obviously related to him: his house in Canada and LA, his pool, his sculpture, his dog, his shoes, his plane..
I didn't understand why this was necessary at all. And surely he doesn't want his home on instagram, regardless of whether he is immediately identifiable or not?
Why just leave out ALL photos related to him? Or at the very least lock your account. .
And one comment from her 'twin' made my skin crawl. She posted a pic of Jim's swimming pool and Travis said something like 'You do realise that twins share everything?'
And if anything in that mythical video is to be believed, she was annoyed that his people, who apparently she termed as 'vultures', nixed their wedding plans.
IF that did happen then I can bloody well see why. Thank goodness he has people around him to protect him. I think she was still on at him to get married even though he's said several times in the last 5 years that he'd never do it again as it doesn't seem necessary anymore.
I've been thinking that the reason for their attack on him is due to the bad press they got for her suicide and his unwillingness to be ensnared by them, but I'm starting to think their plots ran back far further than we first thought. I can't believe they're not even trying to justify where they would have got all her correspondence with him from?
It has just become so ridiculous and is so OBVIOUSLY a shakedown. Those last texts were completely normal and unless you're some kind of sexually repressed simpleton, there's nothing wrong with them at all.
Poor Jim